<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evangelizing The Evangelist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/</link>
	<description>your source for illegal theology downloads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83789</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 22:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83789</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;m just not Truly Reformed then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m just not Truly Reformed then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83785</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 21:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83785</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;83782&quot;]... and the Savior who lived and died to save us all.[/quote]

Or, if you&#039;re Truly Reformed, died to proved a limited atonement of the elect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="83782"]&#8230; and the Savior who lived and died to save us all.[/quote]</p>
<p>Or, if you&#8217;re Truly Reformed, died to proved a limited atonement of the elect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83782</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83782</guid>
		<description>For the record, I have been, on rare occasion (mondays - thursdays... sometimes on sundays), known to be one arrogant SOB.  

Most of you who know me knows that there also beats a heart of tenderness and passion underneath, for the church, her people, the people who choose not to be a part of her, and the Savior who lived and died to save us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I have been, on rare occasion (mondays &#8211; thursdays&#8230; sometimes on sundays), known to be one arrogant SOB.  </p>
<p>Most of you who know me knows that there also beats a heart of tenderness and passion underneath, for the church, her people, the people who choose not to be a part of her, and the Savior who lived and died to save us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83779</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 21:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83779</guid>
		<description>Hehe... well.  Hmm.  I&#039;m not sure how to respond.  I feel like I touched on both of these issues (not needing to be winsome, and my own perceived arrogance over claiming that I &quot;knew&quot; him.&quot;

From about midway through the initial post...

&quot;I cut him off again, and said something along the lines of, “Dude, I’m not saying I know you, or your brother. What I am saying is that I know the Scriptures, we’ve read all the same books, and we most likely know some of the same people, as it’s a small world, after all. I know where you’ve been, what you’ve heard, and how you think. I know you’re a five point Calvinist, that you believe in the complete inerrancy of Scripture, that you believe we live in a corrupt and wicked generation that needs the gospel thrown at them so that the elect can be called out.”

The point I was trying to make was that I had identified a lot about the guy because we are Spiritual brothers or at least first cousins.  I didn&#039;t claim to know his hame, his birthday, or his favorite CCM band (but it was Casting Crowns and everyone knows it).  My claim was, and still is, that I was able to figure out quickly that we had a lot in common, and I was trying to get his brother to talk to me like a peer, rather then an argument victim, or possible convert to Amway..I mean Christianity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe&#8230; well.  Hmm.  I&#8217;m not sure how to respond.  I feel like I touched on both of these issues (not needing to be winsome, and my own perceived arrogance over claiming that I &#8220;knew&#8221; him.&#8221;</p>
<p>From about midway through the initial post&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I cut him off again, and said something along the lines of, “Dude, I’m not saying I know you, or your brother. What I am saying is that I know the Scriptures, we’ve read all the same books, and we most likely know some of the same people, as it’s a small world, after all. I know where you’ve been, what you’ve heard, and how you think. I know you’re a five point Calvinist, that you believe in the complete inerrancy of Scripture, that you believe we live in a corrupt and wicked generation that needs the gospel thrown at them so that the elect can be called out.”</p>
<p>The point I was trying to make was that I had identified a lot about the guy because we are Spiritual brothers or at least first cousins.  I didn&#8217;t claim to know his hame, his birthday, or his favorite CCM band (but it was Casting Crowns and everyone knows it).  My claim was, and still is, that I was able to figure out quickly that we had a lot in common, and I was trying to get his brother to talk to me like a peer, rather then an argument victim, or possible convert to Amway..I mean Christianity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83672</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83672</guid>
		<description>Doug (my pastor) and I were talking about this a little bit yesterday.

Chad, you might be missing a key component of the interaction here, something that the street preacher would never say, but something ingrained in his theology.

He&#039;s not interested in being effective. His theology doesn&#039;t allow for it.

If he&#039;s a master&#039;s guy, and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://ebible.com/bible/1%20corinthians%201%3A12-15&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MacArthurite&lt;/a&gt;, and a 5-point Calvinist, then he has no stake in being effective at his preaching. The basis of salvation is God&#039;s choice, at the beginning of time, to save some and to allow others to continue on into the lake of fire. There&#039;s no reason for God&#039;s choosing, it has no basis in human assent or predisposition. Those who will be saved are predestined to be saved, and that&#039;s that.

So, follow this through to its logical conclusion. If human choice has no play in the move to salvation, then it doesn&#039;t matter if your evangelism is winsome, or effective. Your sole task is to &quot;proclaim the gospel&quot; - and then God calls out whomever he has elected beforehand. The proclamation has a double effect. To the elect, it becomes the proclamation of grace (which they are incapable of resisting), and they are saved. To the unelect, it becomes a double heaping of ye olde damnation, because then they&#039;ve heard the good news and still rejected it. In both cases, the effectiveness of the preacher has no bearing on the outcome.

In fact, the Truly Reformed street preacher might have a vested interest in being really &lt;em&gt;bad&lt;/em&gt; at what he&#039;s doing. If he&#039;s persuasive, he might risk bringing into the fold some who are not elect, but who are persuaded by human preaching (&lt;a href=&quot;http://ebible.com/bible/matthew%2013%3A24-30&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;or Satan&lt;/a&gt;!!) to &lt;em&gt;act&lt;/em&gt; like the elect for a little while, which is of no eternal benefit to them.

If he&#039;s patently ineffective, or even offensive, in his delivery, and some of those in the crowd are &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; called out into salvation, then he&#039;s simply proved the case that they were predestined, and not saved by their own cognitive effort.

I have no special insight into this guy&#039;s mind - I don&#039;t know him (and, let&#039;s be honest Chad, it&#039;s a bit persnickety to claim that you do after 2 minutes of hearing a guy speak). But if his view on evangelism flows out of his view on salvation (how could it not?), and his doctrine of salvation is grounded in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_points_of_Calvinism&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TULIP&lt;/a&gt;, then his methods are in line with his theology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug (my pastor) and I were talking about this a little bit yesterday.</p>
<p>Chad, you might be missing a key component of the interaction here, something that the street preacher would never say, but something ingrained in his theology.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not interested in being effective. His theology doesn&#8217;t allow for it.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s a master&#8217;s guy, and a <a href="http://ebible.com/bible/1%20corinthians%201%3A12-15" rel="nofollow">MacArthurite</a>, and a 5-point Calvinist, then he has no stake in being effective at his preaching. The basis of salvation is God&#8217;s choice, at the beginning of time, to save some and to allow others to continue on into the lake of fire. There&#8217;s no reason for God&#8217;s choosing, it has no basis in human assent or predisposition. Those who will be saved are predestined to be saved, and that&#8217;s that.</p>
<p>So, follow this through to its logical conclusion. If human choice has no play in the move to salvation, then it doesn&#8217;t matter if your evangelism is winsome, or effective. Your sole task is to &#8220;proclaim the gospel&#8221; &#8211; and then God calls out whomever he has elected beforehand. The proclamation has a double effect. To the elect, it becomes the proclamation of grace (which they are incapable of resisting), and they are saved. To the unelect, it becomes a double heaping of ye olde damnation, because then they&#8217;ve heard the good news and still rejected it. In both cases, the effectiveness of the preacher has no bearing on the outcome.</p>
<p>In fact, the Truly Reformed street preacher might have a vested interest in being really <em>bad</em> at what he&#8217;s doing. If he&#8217;s persuasive, he might risk bringing into the fold some who are not elect, but who are persuaded by human preaching (<a href="http://ebible.com/bible/matthew%2013%3A24-30" rel="nofollow">or Satan</a>!!) to <em>act</em> like the elect for a little while, which is of no eternal benefit to them.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s patently ineffective, or even offensive, in his delivery, and some of those in the crowd are <em>still</em> called out into salvation, then he&#8217;s simply proved the case that they were predestined, and not saved by their own cognitive effort.</p>
<p>I have no special insight into this guy&#8217;s mind &#8211; I don&#8217;t know him (and, let&#8217;s be honest Chad, it&#8217;s a bit persnickety to claim that you do after 2 minutes of hearing a guy speak). But if his view on evangelism flows out of his view on salvation (how could it not?), and his doctrine of salvation is grounded in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_points_of_Calvinism" rel="nofollow">TULIP</a>, then his methods are in line with his theology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83181</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 19:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83181</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;83144&quot;][quote comment=&quot;82989&quot;]It was a 4x12 cabinet. Which is actually an extra 8 inches of suck, for those of you scoring along at home.[/quote]

Really? I guess I just expected more presence, more depth from a 4x12. A Behringer 4x12. Made by Behringer.[/quote]

Well, it was definitely a 4x12. But I&#039;ll bet you one of Chad&#039;s buckets of $1 that it wasn&#039;t made by Behringer. It was made by whatever third-world country was shipping half-stack cabs on sale that month. And, no. No more presence for you. Not from Behringer. Actually, the head was probably the culprit. It sells for $349 online and is a booger on the sleeve of Jim Marshall. Read this from the MF site...

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Now featuring digital effects.

Drawing on the vast experience of their design team, the Marshall MG100HDFX Head amps are built to the same exacting standards as all Marshall products. Though compact in size, each one delivers a dynamic yet toneful punch, and they&#039;re all suitable for a wide variety of purposes including rehearsal, recording, and even live music work. The MG100DFX is a 2-channel amp with special features such as FDD (Frequency Dependent Damping), CD ins, plus emulated line out, and emulated headphone jacks. It features digital effects including reverb, delay, chorus, and flange. With 100W, this is a fully gig-capable amp, and it retains all the features that make it great for practice, too.

Marshall MG100HDFX Head Features:

Big Marshall tone
Delivers a dynamic yet toneful punch
100W power
2 channels (footswitchable)
Digital effects including reverb, delay, chorus, and flange
FDD (Frequency Dependent Damping)
CD ins, plus emulated line out, and emulated headphone jacks
25&quot;W x 14&quot;H x 12&quot;D
39 lbs.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

A few phrases stick out as decidedly UN-cool:
1) Now featuring digital effects
2) suitable for... even live music work
3) CD ins
4) fully gig-capable amp

Why the push to sell the idea that one can &lt;i&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; use the amp in a real, live, human gigging situation... with real live &lt;i&gt;crowds&lt;/i&gt; and everything. ?

It&#039;s not your fault, Mike. Good player - bad reh. space. Cheap backline. It&#039;s not your fault. Damn The man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="83144"][quote comment="82989"]It was a 4&#215;12 cabinet. Which is actually an extra 8 inches of suck, for those of you scoring along at home.[/quote]</p>
<p>Really? I guess I just expected more presence, more depth from a 4&#215;12. A Behringer 4&#215;12. Made by Behringer.[/quote]</p>
<p>Well, it was definitely a 4&#215;12. But I&#8217;ll bet you one of Chad&#8217;s buckets of $1 that it wasn&#8217;t made by Behringer. It was made by whatever third-world country was shipping half-stack cabs on sale that month. And, no. No more presence for you. Not from Behringer. Actually, the head was probably the culprit. It sells for $349 online and is a booger on the sleeve of Jim Marshall. Read this from the MF site&#8230;</p>
<p><i><b>Now featuring digital effects.</p>
<p>Drawing on the vast experience of their design team, the Marshall MG100HDFX Head amps are built to the same exacting standards as all Marshall products. Though compact in size, each one delivers a dynamic yet toneful punch, and they&#8217;re all suitable for a wide variety of purposes including rehearsal, recording, and even live music work. The MG100DFX is a 2-channel amp with special features such as FDD (Frequency Dependent Damping), CD ins, plus emulated line out, and emulated headphone jacks. It features digital effects including reverb, delay, chorus, and flange. With 100W, this is a fully gig-capable amp, and it retains all the features that make it great for practice, too.</p>
<p>Marshall MG100HDFX Head Features:</p>
<p>Big Marshall tone<br />
Delivers a dynamic yet toneful punch<br />
100W power<br />
2 channels (footswitchable)<br />
Digital effects including reverb, delay, chorus, and flange<br />
FDD (Frequency Dependent Damping)<br />
CD ins, plus emulated line out, and emulated headphone jacks<br />
25&#8243;W x 14&#8243;H x 12&#8243;D<br />
39 lbs.</b></i></p>
<p>A few phrases stick out as decidedly UN-cool:<br />
1) Now featuring digital effects<br />
2) suitable for&#8230; even live music work<br />
3) CD ins<br />
4) fully gig-capable amp</p>
<p>Why the push to sell the idea that one can <i>actually</i> use the amp in a real, live, human gigging situation&#8230; with real live <i>crowds</i> and everything. ?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not your fault, Mike. Good player &#8211; bad reh. space. Cheap backline. It&#8217;s not your fault. Damn The man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83161</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 17:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83161</guid>
		<description>Things that suck: (in summary)

1.  Thoughtless evangelism.
B.  Behringer
4.  SpiderMan 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things that suck: (in summary)</p>
<p>1.  Thoughtless evangelism.<br />
B.  Behringer<br />
4.  SpiderMan 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83144</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83144</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;82989&quot;]It was a 4x12 cabinet. Which is actually an extra 8 inches of suck, for those of you scoring along at home.[/quote]

Really? I guess I just expected more presence, more depth from a 4x12. A Behringer 4x12. Made by Behringer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="82989"]It was a 4&#215;12 cabinet. Which is actually an extra 8 inches of suck, for those of you scoring along at home.[/quote]</p>
<p>Really? I guess I just expected more presence, more depth from a 4&#215;12. A Behringer 4&#215;12. Made by Behringer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83035</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 07:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83035</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the deal with my threads?

Reply 1:  Church sucks!  Here&#039;s how to fix it!
Reply 2:  Yeah!
Reply 3:  Alec Baldwin&#039;s a prick!
Reply 4:  Yeah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the deal with my threads?</p>
<p>Reply 1:  Church sucks!  Here&#8217;s how to fix it!<br />
Reply 2:  Yeah!<br />
Reply 3:  Alec Baldwin&#8217;s a prick!<br />
Reply 4:  Yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83034</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 07:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83034</guid>
		<description>Bucket full of $1 bills + reading of the Psalms + gentle, humble spirits = blown minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bucket full of $1 bills + reading of the Psalms + gentle, humble spirits = blown minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-83031</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 07:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-83031</guid>
		<description>Regarding Spider Man 3 – Too long, too disjointed, random plot lines all colliding with each other, a giant tossed fruit salad of a movie. (How about that silly jazz club scene?  I thought for a minute that our hero was going to sing “Cuba Pete”!!)  It’s all about the writing, even when you have $250 million to spend.  It’s also a little sobering to think that $375 million changed hands over the weekend to see a guy in a red/black suit fly around New York chasing another guy made out of sand.  I can&#039;t wag my finger because I spent $12.75 to see Spidey at the Grove – definitely a cool place -- Friday night, where I later found out that Sam Raimi and his family were also in attendance.  (We were there with 30 or so friends of the girl who played Mary Jane’s replacement and sang a few bars of “They Say That Falling in Love is Wonderful…”  You’ll be hearing more from her in a few months.)

Regarding the pre-theater discussion – It’s definitely about the tone.  Here’s a discussion question, if anyone is still following this thread:  what would be a viable way to initiate a fruitful conversation about Jesus with someone in a long line in front of the Village Theater on a Friday night in 2007?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Spider Man 3 – Too long, too disjointed, random plot lines all colliding with each other, a giant tossed fruit salad of a movie. (How about that silly jazz club scene?  I thought for a minute that our hero was going to sing “Cuba Pete”!!)  It’s all about the writing, even when you have $250 million to spend.  It’s also a little sobering to think that $375 million changed hands over the weekend to see a guy in a red/black suit fly around New York chasing another guy made out of sand.  I can&#8217;t wag my finger because I spent $12.75 to see Spidey at the Grove – definitely a cool place &#8212; Friday night, where I later found out that Sam Raimi and his family were also in attendance.  (We were there with 30 or so friends of the girl who played Mary Jane’s replacement and sang a few bars of “They Say That Falling in Love is Wonderful…”  You’ll be hearing more from her in a few months.)</p>
<p>Regarding the pre-theater discussion – It’s definitely about the tone.  Here’s a discussion question, if anyone is still following this thread:  what would be a viable way to initiate a fruitful conversation about Jesus with someone in a long line in front of the Village Theater on a Friday night in 2007?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82989</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 03:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82989</guid>
		<description>It was a 4x12 cabinet. Which is actually an extra 8 inches of suck, for those of you scoring along at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a 4&#215;12 cabinet. Which is actually an extra 8 inches of suck, for those of you scoring along at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82954</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 01:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82954</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;82933&quot;]

I feel like that&#039;s a metaphor that I can relate to. Like, directly relate to. Probably because I spent 4 hours last night playing a piano sample through a Marshall head and a Behringer 4x10 cabinet.

That&#039;s eerie that you would pick exactly that example.[/quote]

I know, weird, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="82933"]</p>
<p>I feel like that&#8217;s a metaphor that I can relate to. Like, directly relate to. Probably because I spent 4 hours last night playing a piano sample through a Marshall head and a Behringer 4&#215;10 cabinet.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s eerie that you would pick exactly that example.[/quote]</p>
<p>I know, weird, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill metanoya</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82937</link>
		<dc:creator>bill metanoya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82937</guid>
		<description>The best and most effective evangalist I ever met was my younger brother who was eight years old when he died. His disease slowly drained away his ability to talk and walk and read and write until, in the end, all he could do was give you a hug, a kiss and a smile which every one of God&#039;s creatures received that came near his wheelchair. And when you looked into his eyes you could see the bright light of Jesus within and knew Jesus was near to gently welcome him home to heaven when it was time. 

We don&#039;t convert anyone, God does. Jesus calls us to love others; family, friends, enemies and neighbors and he&#039;ll take care of the rest. That love can take many forms but it rarely involves trying to convince someone of how wrong they are. 

My son William saw Spidey3 opening night as well and had the same opinion as Chad, he didn&#039;t expect a lot and wasn&#039;t disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best and most effective evangalist I ever met was my younger brother who was eight years old when he died. His disease slowly drained away his ability to talk and walk and read and write until, in the end, all he could do was give you a hug, a kiss and a smile which every one of God&#8217;s creatures received that came near his wheelchair. And when you looked into his eyes you could see the bright light of Jesus within and knew Jesus was near to gently welcome him home to heaven when it was time. </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t convert anyone, God does. Jesus calls us to love others; family, friends, enemies and neighbors and he&#8217;ll take care of the rest. That love can take many forms but it rarely involves trying to convince someone of how wrong they are. </p>
<p>My son William saw Spidey3 opening night as well and had the same opinion as Chad, he didn&#8217;t expect a lot and wasn&#8217;t disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82933</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82933</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;82920&quot;]It was like a sample-based instrument playing through a Marshall head through a Behringer 4X10.
[/quote]

I feel like that&#039;s a metaphor that I can relate to. Like, directly relate to. Probably because I spent 4 hours last night playing a piano sample through a Marshall head and a Behringer 4x10 cabinet.

That&#039;s eerie that you would pick exactly that example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="82920"]It was like a sample-based instrument playing through a Marshall head through a Behringer 4X10.<br />
[/quote]</p>
<p>I feel like that&#8217;s a metaphor that I can relate to. Like, directly relate to. Probably because I spent 4 hours last night playing a piano sample through a Marshall head and a Behringer 4&#215;10 cabinet.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s eerie that you would pick exactly that example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82920</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 23:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82920</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an extravert.  I talk to groups of people all the time.  This guy had tone issues.  It was like a sample-based instrument playing through a Marshall head through a Behringer 4X10. 

Not good, is what I&#039;m saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an extravert.  I talk to groups of people all the time.  This guy had tone issues.  It was like a sample-based instrument playing through a Marshall head through a Behringer 4X10. </p>
<p>Not good, is what I&#8217;m saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82884</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 20:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82884</guid>
		<description>Philippians 1:18 &quot;But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice.&quot;

Chad, I enjoyed the story.  I have wrestled with this same issue...and my opinion varies with every instance I guess.  I was recently informed by my pastor that most of the time it&#039;s a difference between introverted and extraverted personalities concerning their evangelism styles...Being an introvert, the thought of getting up and preaching to a group waiting for a movie scares me to death-maybe it&#039;s just not my style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philippians 1:18 &#8220;But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chad, I enjoyed the story.  I have wrestled with this same issue&#8230;and my opinion varies with every instance I guess.  I was recently informed by my pastor that most of the time it&#8217;s a difference between introverted and extraverted personalities concerning their evangelism styles&#8230;Being an introvert, the thought of getting up and preaching to a group waiting for a movie scares me to death-maybe it&#8217;s just not my style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Semsen</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82658</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Semsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 03:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82658</guid>
		<description>Man, what a great post.  I love reading that- reading through all the suspense but not being worried because Chad will surely win in the end. :)  No seriously- I completely agree with you, although I dare say that when we were in college together I would have agreed with you 50%, and if I knew you in high school I would have just prayed for you....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, what a great post.  I love reading that- reading through all the suspense but not being worried because Chad will surely win in the end. :)  No seriously- I completely agree with you, although I dare say that when we were in college together I would have agreed with you 50%, and if I knew you in high school I would have just prayed for you&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82585</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82585</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s cool. I&#039;m not a huge Spidey fan, myself. I wasn&#039;t thrilled by the action sequences either, but I catch myself thinking &quot;wow, some of this CGI looks pretty good...&quot; but some of it didn&#039;t. 

I hated X-Men 3

I loved Superman Returns. LOVED it. 
It&#039;s totally underrated. Have you heard the soundtrack? John Ottman did a BRILLIANT job of weaving the old Superman/Lois theme into a track called &quot;How Could You Leave Us&quot;. 

Crap. Now I have to listen to it again...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s cool. I&#8217;m not a huge Spidey fan, myself. I wasn&#8217;t thrilled by the action sequences either, but I catch myself thinking &#8220;wow, some of this CGI looks pretty good&#8230;&#8221; but some of it didn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>I hated X-Men 3</p>
<p>I loved Superman Returns. LOVED it.<br />
It&#8217;s totally underrated. Have you heard the soundtrack? John Ottman did a BRILLIANT job of weaving the old Superman/Lois theme into a track called &#8220;How Could You Leave Us&#8221;. </p>
<p>Crap. Now I have to listen to it again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-82569</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 19:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2007/05/05/evangelizing-the-evangelist/#comment-82569</guid>
		<description>The french dude was funny... I was pretty checked out by the time Emo-Spiderman showed up, but I was amused for about 5 minutes.  I think the problem for me was that I laughed a bit, but felt no emotion, and no real thrills in the action sequences.  

I thought the underrated Superman Returns from last summer had more insight and emotion in that little speech he have at the end to the sleeping boy (spoiler free for those who haven&#039;t seen it) then the entirety of the Spiderman series.  I just don&#039;t care a whit about any of the characters.

Just me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The french dude was funny&#8230; I was pretty checked out by the time Emo-Spiderman showed up, but I was amused for about 5 minutes.  I think the problem for me was that I laughed a bit, but felt no emotion, and no real thrills in the action sequences.  </p>
<p>I thought the underrated Superman Returns from last summer had more insight and emotion in that little speech he have at the end to the sleeping boy (spoiler free for those who haven&#8217;t seen it) then the entirety of the Spiderman series.  I just don&#8217;t care a whit about any of the characters.</p>
<p>Just me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
