<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groupthink: Professional Clergy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/</link>
	<description>your source for illegal theology downloads</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: likeafire.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Groupthink: Professional Clergy? at Addison Road</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3459</link>
		<dc:creator>likeafire.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Groupthink: Professional Clergy? at Addison Road</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 19:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3459</guid>
		<description>[...] Groupthink: Professional Clergy? at Addison Road Here is a great example fo what I am talking about in process ministry. Instead of putting a church planter in a position of having to succeed by reaching outcomes, put them in a place where they are fairly self sufficient until they reach certain mile-markers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Groupthink: Professional Clergy? at Addison Road Here is a great example fo what I am talking about in process ministry. Instead of putting a church planter in a position of having to succeed by reaching outcomes, put them in a place where they are fairly self sufficient until they reach certain mile-markers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3443</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3443</guid>
		<description>Andrews Jones has been posting quotes from a book written in 1970 called "The Emerging Church". It's remarkablye prescient.

&lt;a href="http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/ourdailyblog/2006/03/emerging_church_1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;quote:&lt;/a&gt;

"For corporate worship, most churches actually depend on secondary resources - the skill, natural ability, and homiletic training of the pastor. In the emerging Church, a new kind of preacher is coming into his own for whom there is presently no adequate training."

Larson, Osborne, The Emerging Church (1970), p56</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrews Jones has been posting quotes from a book written in 1970 called &#8220;The Emerging Church&#8221;. It&#8217;s remarkablye prescient.</p>
<p><a href="http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/ourdailyblog/2006/03/emerging_church_1.html" rel="nofollow">quote:</a></p>
<p>&#8220;For corporate worship, most churches actually depend on secondary resources - the skill, natural ability, and homiletic training of the pastor. In the emerging Church, a new kind of preacher is coming into his own for whom there is presently no adequate training.&#8221;</p>
<p>Larson, Osborne, The Emerging Church (1970), p56</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gretchen</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 07:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>Morphea, 
Yeah the dog's alive.  A good ol' TBD (Tanzania Brown Dog) that Scott adopted (heaven knows why).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morphea,<br />
Yeah the dog&#8217;s alive.  A good ol&#8217; TBD (Tanzania Brown Dog) that Scott adopted (heaven knows why).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>Therein lies the gospel. God is/was able to do what we can't bring ourselves to do, I suppose. I wish I had a  Happy meal answer for you, but I don't. 

Again, I'm really sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Therein lies the gospel. God is/was able to do what we can&#8217;t bring ourselves to do, I suppose. I wish I had a  Happy meal answer for you, but I don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m really sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3431</guid>
		<description>Oh, Chad. Heavens to Betsy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Chad. Heavens to Betsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>No...

I think the elders would have wanted my friend to return in person for... something... some sort of apology.  It came in a letter that was read in the service... two months too late if you ask me.  

I have said a zillion times (not here) that I actually kind of understand his motivations.  He's admitted his sin.  He's paid the price.. (job, friends, reputation...) so why should he be subjected to a public flogging?  His wife is ready to leave town yesterday, even as she makes strides to forgive him.  I can't say with any certainty that I wouldn't do the same thing.  

I guess the problem is that I am perhaps the most direct piece of collateral damage in this little escapade, outside of his immediate family.  So... where's my peace of mind?  When do I get to duck town?  

I got truckloads of grace, but it's just hard to give it to someone who's not there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;</p>
<p>I think the elders would have wanted my friend to return in person for&#8230; something&#8230; some sort of apology.  It came in a letter that was read in the service&#8230; two months too late if you ask me.  </p>
<p>I have said a zillion times (not here) that I actually kind of understand his motivations.  He&#8217;s admitted his sin.  He&#8217;s paid the price.. (job, friends, reputation&#8230;) so why should he be subjected to a public flogging?  His wife is ready to leave town yesterday, even as she makes strides to forgive him.  I can&#8217;t say with any certainty that I wouldn&#8217;t do the same thing.  </p>
<p>I guess the problem is that I am perhaps the most direct piece of collateral damage in this little escapade, outside of his immediate family.  So&#8230; where&#8217;s my peace of mind?  When do I get to duck town?  </p>
<p>I got truckloads of grace, but it&#8217;s just hard to give it to someone who&#8217;s not there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3429</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3429</guid>
		<description>P.S. Michael, to the best of your knowledge, is that dog &lt;i&gt;alive&lt;/i&gt; in that photo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. Michael, to the best of your knowledge, is that dog <i>alive</i> in that photo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3428</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3428</guid>
		<description>I understood from Chad's earlier posts (I'm also wildly speculating - forgive me, Chad) that the utter separation of pastor and church was at least as much the Elders' choice as the pastor's. If that's the case, then Corey, you're right. He'd be walking into the lion's den with A1 sauce and a cherry on top. Sorry again, Chad, not trying to make light of what is obviously a very painful and frustrating situation.

Cerise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understood from Chad&#8217;s earlier posts (I&#8217;m also wildly speculating - forgive me, Chad) that the utter separation of pastor and church was at least as much the Elders&#8217; choice as the pastor&#8217;s. If that&#8217;s the case, then Corey, you&#8217;re right. He&#8217;d be walking into the lion&#8217;s den with A1 sauce and a cherry on top. Sorry again, Chad, not trying to make light of what is obviously a very painful and frustrating situation.</p>
<p>Cerise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3427</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3427</guid>
		<description>chad, I keep thinking about this pastor friend of yours. You say that he is the "single worst offender" in the broken communication camp. In saying this, I don't wanna sound like I'm permissive of sin or dismissive of consequence, but I think I could understand his lack of willingness to try to keep up communication or to advocate a reconciliation. There are times when a sinner &lt;i&gt;knows&lt;/i&gt; exactly how bad he or she has fumbled and to readmit himself into the company of those he's sinned against is to walk into the lion's den covered in A1 sauce. I'm reading Yancey's &lt;i&gt;What's So Amazing About Grace?&lt;/i&gt; and he notes that the church can be one of the strongest institutions of UNgrace in existence (and Lutherans were mentioned by name... cheers, Mr. Yancey). We've all been taught that the stubborn sinner needs to hear the Law to illuminate his sin and the penitent sinner needs to hear the grace that frees him from his burden, but many in the church just assume that they're the first to interact with this sinner, post-sin. Kinda like those people who think they're the first ones to &lt;i&gt;ever&lt;/i&gt; make fun of my last name (Witt) by calling me nit-wit or half-wit. After a point, you just look at them like they're mentally retarded. Your pastor may feel the same thing. Why go back to a church (or in some cases ANY church at all) where the congregation is going to 1. use his public sin as a footstool to say, "I might be a sinner, but at least I've never done THAT..."; and/or 2. feel the need to illuminate his sin, extract their pound of flesh, and THEN accept him back because their WWJD bracelets and bumper stickers demand it. Of course, I'm speaking in extremes and speculating wildly about your personal situtation (which I know less than nothing about). But it's this little snapshot that makes me so angry at AmeriChurch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chad, I keep thinking about this pastor friend of yours. You say that he is the &#8220;single worst offender&#8221; in the broken communication camp. In saying this, I don&#8217;t wanna sound like I&#8217;m permissive of sin or dismissive of consequence, but I think I could understand his lack of willingness to try to keep up communication or to advocate a reconciliation. There are times when a sinner <i>knows</i> exactly how bad he or she has fumbled and to readmit himself into the company of those he&#8217;s sinned against is to walk into the lion&#8217;s den covered in A1 sauce. I&#8217;m reading Yancey&#8217;s <i>What&#8217;s So Amazing About Grace?</i> and he notes that the church can be one of the strongest institutions of UNgrace in existence (and Lutherans were mentioned by name&#8230; cheers, Mr. Yancey). We&#8217;ve all been taught that the stubborn sinner needs to hear the Law to illuminate his sin and the penitent sinner needs to hear the grace that frees him from his burden, but many in the church just assume that they&#8217;re the first to interact with this sinner, post-sin. Kinda like those people who think they&#8217;re the first ones to <i>ever</i> make fun of my last name (Witt) by calling me nit-wit or half-wit. After a point, you just look at them like they&#8217;re mentally retarded. Your pastor may feel the same thing. Why go back to a church (or in some cases ANY church at all) where the congregation is going to 1. use his public sin as a footstool to say, &#8220;I might be a sinner, but at least I&#8217;ve never done THAT&#8230;&#8221;; and/or 2. feel the need to illuminate his sin, extract their pound of flesh, and THEN accept him back because their WWJD bracelets and bumper stickers demand it. Of course, I&#8217;m speaking in extremes and speculating wildly about your personal situtation (which I know less than nothing about). But it&#8217;s this little snapshot that makes me so angry at AmeriChurch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>Nonsense, Corey. I thought you had a great response to both Michael and Chad and laughed at your analogy. And Stick's enactment, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense, Corey. I thought you had a great response to both Michael and Chad and laughed at your analogy. And Stick&#8217;s enactment, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stick</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3424</link>
		<dc:creator>Stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3424</guid>
		<description>"Captain, there've been reports of enemy troops with XM52 Poop-launchers in the trees on that hill over there."

"OK son, tell the boys to keep their eyes open and noses plugged."

"INCOMIIIIIIIIING!!!!!"





Splat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Captain, there&#8217;ve been reports of enemy troops with XM52 Poop-launchers in the trees on that hill over there.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;OK son, tell the boys to keep their eyes open and noses plugged.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;INCOMIIIIIIIIING!!!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Splat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3423</guid>
		<description>fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3422</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3422</guid>
		<description>um... I didn't mean to strike through most of my comments. Is this because of some unconfessed sin or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um&#8230; I didn&#8217;t mean to strike through most of my comments. Is this because of some unconfessed sin or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3421</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3421</guid>
		<description>Most (if not all) of my "training" in the church has gone thrugh a Lutheran filter, as I went to a Lutheran high school back in Texas and then a Lutheran University here in CA (and then went on to teach at Lutheran middle and high schools for a handful of years - all of which were attached to congregations). My understanding is that the pastor has always been regarded as an employee &lt;i&gt;of the congregation&lt;/i&gt;, and could therefore be subject to any reprimand that an employer would normally loft. But I rarely saw this in practice. Many pastors with whom I've dealt were powerful men (everything's relative) and were able to call shots and move an elder board wherever they saw fit. And now that I help market the church, I see more prominent examples of pastors/preachers/teachers/leaders becoming such iconic figureheads for an entire congregation that it borders on the creepy. I would LOVE to see a correction back to "pastoral compromise" where a pastor was compensated for his work, but compensated in such a way that it's respectable to those to whom he ministers. I guess I like the idea of a pastor holding a day job. ESPECIALLY in a church plant, where there's no money to spare anyway. I'm losing my ability to be sypathetic when another church plant closes its doors because they "just can't afford to pay their pastor, music minister, and creative arts director a competitive full-time salary and housing allowance".

And Chad, I understand your situation, and I'm really really sorry. I think it's a function of two things: first of all, some pastors get deified in such a way that when they fall from grace it's like falling from heaven itself and there's hardly a way to deal with the carnage of what's left of that impact. Secondly, I believe that all 20 of these comments point to the fact that we're trying to somehow make a stormworthy building out of incongruent measurements. We're working with a beautiful machine that God built (the Church)- one that is luxurious, swift, effectve, utilitarian, and sleek all at the same time- but we have the mind, movements, and mechanical skills of monkeys. What we do best is to throw poop at each other. It's hard to see the light at the end of this tunnel because we're humans and, until we cease to be, we're going to continue falling from grace in whatever form that takes, be it putting too much pressure on our pastor to be the Jesus Stand-In, or dealing with our own filth in the shadows.

As I was reading through the previous 19 comments, I just started to bubble over with things that I wanted to say in reponse to Mike's original post and then the ensuing dialogue about Chad's experience. Unfortunately, it's all hitting my keyboard at once and I feel like I'm &lt;i&gt;juggling&lt;/i&gt; more than really adding something profound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most (if not all) of my &#8220;training&#8221; in the church has gone thrugh a Lutheran filter, as I went to a Lutheran high school back in Texas and then a Lutheran University here in CA (and then went on to teach at Lutheran middle and high schools for a handful of years - all of which were attached to congregations). My understanding is that the pastor has always been regarded as an employee <i>of the congregation</i>, and could therefore be subject to any reprimand that an employer would normally loft. But I rarely saw this in practice. Many pastors with whom I&#8217;ve dealt were powerful men (everything&#8217;s relative) and were able to call shots and move an elder board wherever they saw fit. And now that I help market the church, I see more prominent examples of pastors/preachers/teachers/leaders becoming such iconic figureheads for an entire congregation that it borders on the creepy. I would LOVE to see a correction back to &#8220;pastoral compromise&#8221; where a pastor was compensated for his work, but compensated in such a way that it&#8217;s respectable to those to whom he ministers. I guess I like the idea of a pastor holding a day job. ESPECIALLY in a church plant, where there&#8217;s no money to spare anyway. I&#8217;m losing my ability to be sypathetic when another church plant closes its doors because they &#8220;just can&#8217;t afford to pay their pastor, music minister, and creative arts director a competitive full-time salary and housing allowance&#8221;.</p>
<p>And Chad, I understand your situation, and I&#8217;m really really sorry. I think it&#8217;s a function of two things: first of all, some pastors get deified in such a way that when they fall from grace it&#8217;s like falling from heaven itself and there&#8217;s hardly a way to deal with the carnage of what&#8217;s left of that impact. Secondly, I believe that all 20 of these comments point to the fact that we&#8217;re trying to somehow make a stormworthy building out of incongruent measurements. We&#8217;re working with a beautiful machine that God built (the Church)- one that is luxurious, swift, effectve, utilitarian, and sleek all at the same time- but we have the mind, movements, and mechanical skills of monkeys. What we do best is to throw poop at each other. It&#8217;s hard to see the light at the end of this tunnel because we&#8217;re humans and, until we cease to be, we&#8217;re going to continue falling from grace in whatever form that takes, be it putting too much pressure on our pastor to be the Jesus Stand-In, or dealing with our own filth in the shadows.</p>
<p>As I was reading through the previous 19 comments, I just started to bubble over with things that I wanted to say in reponse to Mike&#8217;s original post and then the ensuing dialogue about Chad&#8217;s experience. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s all hitting my keyboard at once and I feel like I&#8217;m <i>juggling</i> more than really adding something profound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aly hawkins</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3413</link>
		<dc:creator>aly hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 03:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3413</guid>
		<description>I'm really late to be weighing in on this topic, but I feel uniquely qualified, since I am a) a pastors' daughter twice over, b) a pastor's wife, and c) an ex-resident of East Africa. I also have good taste in footwear, but I don't know if that helps here.

Even though my entire life--literally--has been in some way financially subsidized by pastoral income, I am a stong proponent of non-paid leadership in church communities, not because I feel there is a biblical mandate either way (as Doug pointed out, there isn't), but because I think we've swung way too far past the point of reason on one extreme and it's time for some course correction. There is still benefit in healthy communities of paid pastoral staff (CCC is one example), but I see the trend tending toward setting up unrealistic and unhealthy expectations, many of which have been mentioned here. As an added caveat, I think those expectations sometimes extend to the pastor's family, and I think that is especially unhealthy. Ideally, leaders' families would whole-heartedly embrace being a part of the church community...but that's an ideal that should be for ALL families, and the added pressure of paying one over the other can be a detriment. I don't even attend the church at which Ash is employed, largely because of these expectations.

I'm with Cerise on this one, at least until we can swing the pendulum back in a more balanced arc. Co-journeyers can, I think, do more toward "being" the church over "doing" or "presenting" church, at least on the local level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really late to be weighing in on this topic, but I feel uniquely qualified, since I am a) a pastors&#8217; daughter twice over, b) a pastor&#8217;s wife, and c) an ex-resident of East Africa. I also have good taste in footwear, but I don&#8217;t know if that helps here.</p>
<p>Even though my entire life&#8211;literally&#8211;has been in some way financially subsidized by pastoral income, I am a stong proponent of non-paid leadership in church communities, not because I feel there is a biblical mandate either way (as Doug pointed out, there isn&#8217;t), but because I think we&#8217;ve swung way too far past the point of reason on one extreme and it&#8217;s time for some course correction. There is still benefit in healthy communities of paid pastoral staff (CCC is one example), but I see the trend tending toward setting up unrealistic and unhealthy expectations, many of which have been mentioned here. As an added caveat, I think those expectations sometimes extend to the pastor&#8217;s family, and I think that is especially unhealthy. Ideally, leaders&#8217; families would whole-heartedly embrace being a part of the church community&#8230;but that&#8217;s an ideal that should be for ALL families, and the added pressure of paying one over the other can be a detriment. I don&#8217;t even attend the church at which Ash is employed, largely because of these expectations.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Cerise on this one, at least until we can swing the pendulum back in a more balanced arc. Co-journeyers can, I think, do more toward &#8220;being&#8221; the church over &#8220;doing&#8221; or &#8220;presenting&#8221; church, at least on the local level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3408</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3408</guid>
		<description>Chad, that's a shite lesson to have to learn and I admire you. Sounds like there have been some extremely unfortunate reactions and actions taken after your pastor came clean and you're expected to shrug, say "Easy come, easy go" and keep things pretty. Keep venting, good friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad, that&#8217;s a shite lesson to have to learn and I admire you. Sounds like there have been some extremely unfortunate reactions and actions taken after your pastor came clean and you&#8217;re expected to shrug, say &#8220;Easy come, easy go&#8221; and keep things pretty. Keep venting, good friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3406</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3406</guid>
		<description>Doug...

I appreciate your words.  Apparantly this is groupthink / group therapy.  Sorry.  I haven't found a place where I can dump these frustrations in the real world.  E has heard them one too many times...  and it's just such a bummer.  Everyone's just... well... moving on. 

Except for me...  I'm still pretty bent out of shape...  so I have to choose keeping the peace (and the paycheck) or Making a Federal Case Out of it.  I think I have to choose the former, both for my own mental health, and my relationships at church.  

The lasting lesson that I am taking away from all this is that, in a church environement, up is down and black is white.  My marriage has taught me that transparancy and confession leads to wholeness and healing.  In the church, as best I can see, confession and transparancy leads to a quickie divorce, and the kids are left to pick up the pieces.  I think it's an unfortunate lesson, and part of me rejects it.  But personal experience is personal experience, and it will not be reasoned or argued away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug&#8230;</p>
<p>I appreciate your words.  Apparantly this is groupthink / group therapy.  Sorry.  I haven&#8217;t found a place where I can dump these frustrations in the real world.  E has heard them one too many times&#8230;  and it&#8217;s just such a bummer.  Everyone&#8217;s just&#8230; well&#8230; moving on. </p>
<p>Except for me&#8230;  I&#8217;m still pretty bent out of shape&#8230;  so I have to choose keeping the peace (and the paycheck) or Making a Federal Case Out of it.  I think I have to choose the former, both for my own mental health, and my relationships at church.  </p>
<p>The lasting lesson that I am taking away from all this is that, in a church environement, up is down and black is white.  My marriage has taught me that transparancy and confession leads to wholeness and healing.  In the church, as best I can see, confession and transparancy leads to a quickie divorce, and the kids are left to pick up the pieces.  I think it&#8217;s an unfortunate lesson, and part of me rejects it.  But personal experience is personal experience, and it will not be reasoned or argued away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3403</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3403</guid>
		<description>Chad  I think I understand and I am sorry for what you are having to bear.  Most of us are not as good as others think we are and not are as together as we wish we were.  We sing and teach about amazing grace but the fact is most churches are not capable of exercising it when they feel hurt, betrayed and angry.  Many seasoned pastors that I am familiar with know this.  Because they know or at least suspect that the church's grace may  not be sufficent for them, they seek to hide their dark side and cover their sin.  They like a whole lot of church folks have a hard time confessing their sins to each other and praying for each other that they may be healed. 
 
Maybe its unrealistic to expect in a congregation of hundreds you can create a climate of grace.  Maybe our churches are just too big.  I know I sense more grace in a small group that knows me well and loves me anyway than in a large group that experiences me from afar.  

The twelve step people know the value of confession but also know its limits and dangers.  Step 5 says we admit to God, self and another the exact nature of our wrongs.  I don't think it means confess to everyone the exact nature of your wrongs.  Step 9 says make amends to those we hurt except when to do so would inflict further hurt on them or others. 

Unfortunately, often still shoot our wounded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad  I think I understand and I am sorry for what you are having to bear.  Most of us are not as good as others think we are and not are as together as we wish we were.  We sing and teach about amazing grace but the fact is most churches are not capable of exercising it when they feel hurt, betrayed and angry.  Many seasoned pastors that I am familiar with know this.  Because they know or at least suspect that the church&#8217;s grace may  not be sufficent for them, they seek to hide their dark side and cover their sin.  They like a whole lot of church folks have a hard time confessing their sins to each other and praying for each other that they may be healed. </p>
<p>Maybe its unrealistic to expect in a congregation of hundreds you can create a climate of grace.  Maybe our churches are just too big.  I know I sense more grace in a small group that knows me well and loves me anyway than in a large group that experiences me from afar.  </p>
<p>The twelve step people know the value of confession but also know its limits and dangers.  Step 5 says we admit to God, self and another the exact nature of our wrongs.  I don&#8217;t think it means confess to everyone the exact nature of your wrongs.  Step 9 says make amends to those we hurt except when to do so would inflict further hurt on them or others. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, often still shoot our wounded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>Chad, you're in a hairy situation, no doubt about it. I hadn't realized that relationships between your (former?) pastor, the congregation and the elders had decayed to such a point. I'm so sorry you're the one to shoulder this, love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad, you&#8217;re in a hairy situation, no doubt about it. I hadn&#8217;t realized that relationships between your (former?) pastor, the congregation and the elders had decayed to such a point. I&#8217;m so sorry you&#8217;re the one to shoulder this, love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3401</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3401</guid>
		<description>I'm so biased, since I prefer very, very small churches anyway, that I'm still thinking that smallish congregations (not a hair above 50...or maybe 30) would render the whole point moot and is therefore the more desirable model. As long as at least one of those 30-50 plays the guitter and sings pretty well. No one person could possibly keep the pedestal thing going (whether by her/him or the congregation), no congregation could possibly support a full-time paid minister and there wouldn't be so many people that they couldn't take care of each other - and that the pastor(s) couldn't shepherd - beautifully. But, like I said, I'm a biased non-church-member.

Cerise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so biased, since I prefer very, very small churches anyway, that I&#8217;m still thinking that smallish congregations (not a hair above 50&#8230;or maybe 30) would render the whole point moot and is therefore the more desirable model. As long as at least one of those 30-50 plays the guitter and sings pretty well. No one person could possibly keep the pedestal thing going (whether by her/him or the congregation), no congregation could possibly support a full-time paid minister and there wouldn&#8217;t be so many people that they couldn&#8217;t take care of each other - and that the pastor(s) couldn&#8217;t shepherd - beautifully. But, like I said, I&#8217;m a biased non-church-member.</p>
<p>Cerise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3400</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3400</guid>
		<description>Doug,

Please understand that with my own personal experiences of the past three months, my perspective on this issue is going to be about as clear as a puddle of mud.  I have a good church.  A really good church.  I just happened to have witnessed them not sure how to deal with a pastor who made a huge mistake.  Everyone is saying the right things... saying nice things... but no one really knows how to deal.  The end result has been a complete severing of relationship, which is just the devil kicking us to the curb and reminding us that he's got free reign over THIS world, if you ask me.  

Now... the pastor in question is A.) solely responsible for the sin that caused his resignation, and B.) the single worst offender in the broken communication / relationship problem.  Everyone at the church thinks I am an advocate for him because we had a friendship, but that's just not true.  If anything, I am more peeved at him then anyone, as I have had to shoulder a huge burden the past three months, keeping the quality of the services up through a rotating group of preachers and teachers.  No one has more reason that I do to have a personal vendetta against this man, as he left me high and frickin dry.  My wife sat out in the service this past week and commented that she hoped the elders and leaders realized that I had become the undisputed leader of sunday morning services.  I certainly didn't ask for such a "privilege."

I am peeved at them all for simply not forcing everyone to deal with one another, and settling for severed relationship instead.  I don't do severed relationships.  I just don't.  I'm peeved at my elders for not taking me seriously when I asked where the words "permanant" and "disqualification" sat next to each other in the Bible.  What we have here is a human construct that doesn't really resemble anything in scripture, IMO.  We have expectations about how clergy are to behave (often unreasonable) and then we have no grid to deal with them when they don't. and relationship is trashed.  

What a load of bullcrap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,</p>
<p>Please understand that with my own personal experiences of the past three months, my perspective on this issue is going to be about as clear as a puddle of mud.  I have a good church.  A really good church.  I just happened to have witnessed them not sure how to deal with a pastor who made a huge mistake.  Everyone is saying the right things&#8230; saying nice things&#8230; but no one really knows how to deal.  The end result has been a complete severing of relationship, which is just the devil kicking us to the curb and reminding us that he&#8217;s got free reign over THIS world, if you ask me.  </p>
<p>Now&#8230; the pastor in question is A.) solely responsible for the sin that caused his resignation, and B.) the single worst offender in the broken communication / relationship problem.  Everyone at the church thinks I am an advocate for him because we had a friendship, but that&#8217;s just not true.  If anything, I am more peeved at him then anyone, as I have had to shoulder a huge burden the past three months, keeping the quality of the services up through a rotating group of preachers and teachers.  No one has more reason that I do to have a personal vendetta against this man, as he left me high and frickin dry.  My wife sat out in the service this past week and commented that she hoped the elders and leaders realized that I had become the undisputed leader of sunday morning services.  I certainly didn&#8217;t ask for such a &#8220;privilege.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am peeved at them all for simply not forcing everyone to deal with one another, and settling for severed relationship instead.  I don&#8217;t do severed relationships.  I just don&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m peeved at my elders for not taking me seriously when I asked where the words &#8220;permanant&#8221; and &#8220;disqualification&#8221; sat next to each other in the Bible.  What we have here is a human construct that doesn&#8217;t really resemble anything in scripture, IMO.  We have expectations about how clergy are to behave (often unreasonable) and then we have no grid to deal with them when they don&#8217;t. and relationship is trashed.  </p>
<p>What a load of bullcrap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3398</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3398</guid>
		<description>Chad, your place must be much different than mine.  Our church doesn't put me on the pedastal or maybe I stepped off of it.  But everyone seems to know that I am not the most spiritual one in the group and I think I have been around long enough to squash everyone's delusion that I could be the idol of their spirituality.  It's been a long time since anyone doted on my every gilded word. The people here are much more ga ga about Michael than me.  He is the golden boy but I'm just the guy who has hung around here for the last 17 years. 

I don't think congregations alone can be blamed for the way they put the pastor on a pedastal or expect him or her to do all the ministry.  I think too many pastors need to be needed and so they create and feed the situation.   

I think I have gone far afield from the original question about professional clergy. 
 I am grateful that for the last 24 years the Church has "freed me from worldly avocation" by providing a salary and some benefits for my family. The attraction of a tent-making model of ministry might be attractive simply because I have never done it.  I would like to hear from someone who has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad, your place must be much different than mine.  Our church doesn&#8217;t put me on the pedastal or maybe I stepped off of it.  But everyone seems to know that I am not the most spiritual one in the group and I think I have been around long enough to squash everyone&#8217;s delusion that I could be the idol of their spirituality.  It&#8217;s been a long time since anyone doted on my every gilded word. The people here are much more ga ga about Michael than me.  He is the golden boy but I&#8217;m just the guy who has hung around here for the last 17 years. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think congregations alone can be blamed for the way they put the pastor on a pedastal or expect him or her to do all the ministry.  I think too many pastors need to be needed and so they create and feed the situation.   </p>
<p>I think I have gone far afield from the original question about professional clergy.<br />
 I am grateful that for the last 24 years the Church has &#8220;freed me from worldly avocation&#8221; by providing a salary and some benefits for my family. The attraction of a tent-making model of ministry might be attractive simply because I have never done it.  I would like to hear from someone who has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>Don't know why not - the scenery is kick-ass and you can't beat the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know why not - the scenery is kick-ass and you can&#8217;t beat the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3393</guid>
		<description>Jason

You're right, their not totally leaving the pastor to fend for himself, but I don't know that it's an entirely translatable paradigm. At least here in the states, property has an equity value that far outweighs the funtional value. In the areas where these men are serving, a house has great functional value, but can't really be sold or converted into other resources. There's not really a hot re-financing boom in Tanzanian real estate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, their not totally leaving the pastor to fend for himself, but I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s an entirely translatable paradigm. At least here in the states, property has an equity value that far outweighs the funtional value. In the areas where these men are serving, a house has great functional value, but can&#8217;t really be sold or converted into other resources. There&#8217;s not really a hot re-financing boom in Tanzanian real estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3392</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3392</guid>
		<description>see, and I'm trying to get them to add an extra "Pastor" to my name ...

"Pastor Michael Lee, Pastor of Worship Ministries Pastor" is what it should read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see, and I&#8217;m trying to get them to add an extra &#8220;Pastor&#8221; to my name &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Pastor Michael Lee, Pastor of Worship Ministries Pastor&#8221; is what it should read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3390</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3390</guid>
		<description>Simone,

I totally agree with you in that pastors, especially pastors of long running, successful ministries, do like their pastoral perks, don't they?  Who doesn't like it when people respect you and listen to your opinions and dote on your every gilded word?  

Everyone should know that I just witnessed a spectacular pastoral fall from grace, so my perspective on this is gonna be pretty darn calloused.  Oh heck... here it is:  I think the pastor on a pedestal model is a big, fat, steaming load of bullcrap.  The members of a congregation get to project themselves onto their pastor.  He (or she, but who am I kidding) is a local celebrity, providing the congregant with an identity boost.  We may worship Jessica Alba or Johnny Depp as our idols of physical beauty, but we worship our pastor as our idols of spirituality.  

The pastor gives a good talk, the congregation grows, we're all winners!  

In fact, the only thing we like more than seeing our favorite celebrities ascend... is watching them crash and burn.  

This is why I made them remove the word "Pastor" next to my name on the bulliten.  Who needs the pressure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simone,</p>
<p>I totally agree with you in that pastors, especially pastors of long running, successful ministries, do like their pastoral perks, don&#8217;t they?  Who doesn&#8217;t like it when people respect you and listen to your opinions and dote on your every gilded word?  </p>
<p>Everyone should know that I just witnessed a spectacular pastoral fall from grace, so my perspective on this is gonna be pretty darn calloused.  Oh heck&#8230; here it is:  I think the pastor on a pedestal model is a big, fat, steaming load of bullcrap.  The members of a congregation get to project themselves onto their pastor.  He (or she, but who am I kidding) is a local celebrity, providing the congregant with an identity boost.  We may worship Jessica Alba or Johnny Depp as our idols of physical beauty, but we worship our pastor as our idols of spirituality.  </p>
<p>The pastor gives a good talk, the congregation grows, we&#8217;re all winners!  </p>
<p>In fact, the only thing we like more than seeing our favorite celebrities ascend&#8230; is watching them crash and burn.  </p>
<p>This is why I made them remove the word &#8220;Pastor&#8221; next to my name on the bulliten.  Who needs the pressure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Clark</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>Interesting that even in this context,the church is providing a house and a means to an income.  It shows a major committment to free the pastor to be available.

In the west buying someone a house, and giving them a job would be a major investment...or what would be the translatable experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that even in this context,the church is providing a house and a means to an income.  It shows a major committment to free the pastor to be available.</p>
<p>In the west buying someone a house, and giving them a job would be a major investment&#8230;or what would be the translatable experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lee</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>I think that one of the things that might be gained would be a renewed understanding of how the individual community members see their own role. Instead of "that person is sick, we should send the pastor over", it becomes either "that person is sick, I should go over" or "that person is sick, and we won't do anything to aid or comfort them." The second kind of community will die, quickly, and the first kind will flourish, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one of the things that might be gained would be a renewed understanding of how the individual community members see their own role. Instead of &#8220;that person is sick, we should send the pastor over&#8221;, it becomes either &#8220;that person is sick, I should go over&#8221; or &#8220;that person is sick, and we won&#8217;t do anything to aid or comfort them.&#8221; The second kind of community will die, quickly, and the first kind will flourish, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3386</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3386</guid>
		<description>The concept and practice in Tanzania is a creative approach to an age-old issue that has been with the church since before its birth.  In the apostolic circle there seems to have been those engaged in full-time supported ministry (perhaps Peter, James) and those who were as we as "tent makers"  (Paul).  Jesus engaged in his ministry full time with out having gainful employment on the side.  (Supported by some well to do women -according to the gospel record)
  
So I don't think the scriptures lay down one model for ministry.

One of the practical realities that is facing some north american churches is the spiraling costs of having a full-time ordained installed pastor.  It is getting so that a congregation under 100 or so is unable to support the salary, medical insurance, and housing needs of its pastor.  Add to this the experience of the new church plant that has no property or facility with little hope of purchasing in today's real estate market and you have the necessity to look at options.
 
I wonder if the Tanzania model is tranferable.  The church provides a parsonage (church owned house) and a part-time "secular" job- like maybe it has a business such as a used furniture store or some other retail business that not only provides a needed service to the community but a stream of income for the pastor.  The pastor works part time running or working in the business and part-time in teaching and leading the church.  The shepherding and care is done primarily thru life groups or volunteer staff so gifted. 

This might work better in situations where the pastor is seen more as minister of word, sacrament and prayer than as administrator or shepherd/care chaplain.  

Are any of you aware of a model like this in an urban area in North America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept and practice in Tanzania is a creative approach to an age-old issue that has been with the church since before its birth.  In the apostolic circle there seems to have been those engaged in full-time supported ministry (perhaps Peter, James) and those who were as we as &#8220;tent makers&#8221;  (Paul).  Jesus engaged in his ministry full time with out having gainful employment on the side.  (Supported by some well to do women -according to the gospel record)</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t think the scriptures lay down one model for ministry.</p>
<p>One of the practical realities that is facing some north american churches is the spiraling costs of having a full-time ordained installed pastor.  It is getting so that a congregation under 100 or so is unable to support the salary, medical insurance, and housing needs of its pastor.  Add to this the experience of the new church plant that has no property or facility with little hope of purchasing in today&#8217;s real estate market and you have the necessity to look at options.</p>
<p>I wonder if the Tanzania model is tranferable.  The church provides a parsonage (church owned house) and a part-time &#8220;secular&#8221; job- like maybe it has a business such as a used furniture store or some other retail business that not only provides a needed service to the community but a stream of income for the pastor.  The pastor works part time running or working in the business and part-time in teaching and leading the church.  The shepherding and care is done primarily thru life groups or volunteer staff so gifted. </p>
<p>This might work better in situations where the pastor is seen more as minister of word, sacrament and prayer than as administrator or shepherd/care chaplain.  </p>
<p>Are any of you aware of a model like this in an urban area in North America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simone</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3380</link>
		<dc:creator>simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3380</guid>
		<description>What would be gained?  Perhaps more congregational ownership and responsibility.  Perhaps preaching that was more connected with everyday life...

But perhaps not.  If the church and it's leaders were not committed to these things, then having a tent-making minister probably wouldn't change anything.  The minister would just become burnt out quicker and the church would shift into a 'maintanence mode' where programs might continue but innovation and any real pastoring would stop.

I'm interested in Chad's comments about blurring the line between clergy and congregation.  I definately think it's a good idea (my husband is a pastor) - but I wonder if to some extent ministers place themselves (or let themselves be placed) on lofty perches - by how they dress, where they stand and sit in church, how they introduce themselves, how they preach, and how open they are about their own struggles.  I think it can be easier to hide behind a clerical collar or title than to do the hard work of living alongside people and loving them and teaching them the gospel day by day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be gained?  Perhaps more congregational ownership and responsibility.  Perhaps preaching that was more connected with everyday life&#8230;</p>
<p>But perhaps not.  If the church and it&#8217;s leaders were not committed to these things, then having a tent-making minister probably wouldn&#8217;t change anything.  The minister would just become burnt out quicker and the church would shift into a &#8216;maintanence mode&#8217; where programs might continue but innovation and any real pastoring would stop.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in Chad&#8217;s comments about blurring the line between clergy and congregation.  I definately think it&#8217;s a good idea (my husband is a pastor) - but I wonder if to some extent ministers place themselves (or let themselves be placed) on lofty perches - by how they dress, where they stand and sit in church, how they introduce themselves, how they preach, and how open they are about their own struggles.  I think it can be easier to hide behind a clerical collar or title than to do the hard work of living alongside people and loving them and teaching them the gospel day by day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>Yes, right, that seems healthy. I mean, maybe the pastor's role SHOULDN'T encapsulate so many duties, right? Wonder if any western congregations are fiddling with this concept [strokes chin].

I'm gonna go out on a limb, here...your input wouldn't be coming from the perspective of a grown-up pastor's child, would it? Hmmm?

Cerise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, right, that seems healthy. I mean, maybe the pastor&#8217;s role SHOULDN&#8217;T encapsulate so many duties, right? Wonder if any western congregations are fiddling with this concept [strokes chin].</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna go out on a limb, here&#8230;your input wouldn&#8217;t be coming from the perspective of a grown-up pastor&#8217;s child, would it? Hmmm?</p>
<p>Cerise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>I gotta be honest... anything that blurs the line between clergy and congregation is the right move, as far as I am concerned.  I am sort of coming at it from the opposite side, in that I think the pastor would actually benefit from not being placed on so lofty a perch.  I think a congregation that treated its pastor as a fellow soldier, rather than the general who meters out orders, would be a healthy congregation, indeed.

I know for a fact that it would benefit pastor's children...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta be honest&#8230; anything that blurs the line between clergy and congregation is the right move, as far as I am concerned.  I am sort of coming at it from the opposite side, in that I think the pastor would actually benefit from not being placed on so lofty a perch.  I think a congregation that treated its pastor as a fellow soldier, rather than the general who meters out orders, would be a healthy congregation, indeed.</p>
<p>I know for a fact that it would benefit pastor&#8217;s children&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphea</title>
		<link>http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/2006/02/groupthink-professional-clergy/#comment-3375</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addisonrd.com/WordPress/?p=504#comment-3375</guid>
		<description>This seems like an interesting idea for the church to contemplate. One thing I'm curious about, though, is that I wonder how accessible the pastors who farm their own land are expected to be to the community in a counseling capacity? The "professional" pastors I've known (nearly all of them) seem to view pastoring a flock as a full-time job (what with counseling, administration, visiting the sick and home-bound, performing various familial ceremonies and such). Presumably churches pay them so that they CAN be accessible to congregationalists who need them and also free to perform the myriad duties of a full-time preacher. Obviously if the pastor was to be one of the working stiffs (not that pro pastors don't work, oh, dear me no), just like the laity, then many of the aforementioned duties would need to be distributed amongst the members, right? Is that how the church you mentioned works? Another thought: if a church were the size of the early church congregations - I guess 'home churches' would be the equivalent label nowadays? - perhaps there wouldn't be so many duties for a pastor to carry alone. Perhaps it would obviate the need for a pastor who only pastors altogether. 

Is that what you're getting at? Doug, what say you?

Cerise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like an interesting idea for the church to contemplate. One thing I&#8217;m curious about, though, is that I wonder how accessible the pastors who farm their own land are expected to be to the community in a counseling capacity? The &#8220;professional&#8221; pastors I&#8217;ve known (nearly all of them) seem to view pastoring a flock as a full-time job (what with counseling, administration, visiting the sick and home-bound, performing various familial ceremonies and such). Presumably churches pay them so that they CAN be accessible to congregationalists who need them and also free to perform the myriad duties of a full-time preacher. Obviously if the pastor was to be one of the working stiffs (not that pro pastors don&#8217;t work, oh, dear me no), just like the laity, then many of the aforementioned duties would need to be distributed amongst the members, right? Is that how the church you mentioned works? Another thought: if a church were the size of the early church congregations - I guess &#8216;home churches&#8217; would be the equivalent label nowadays? - perhaps there wouldn&#8217;t be so many duties for a pastor to carry alone. Perhaps it would obviate the need for a pastor who only pastors altogether. </p>
<p>Is that what you&#8217;re getting at? Doug, what say you?</p>
<p>Cerise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
