Recently, people have been stopping me on the street and saying to me, “Michael, you’re a well-respected voice of reason in these uncertain times; tell me, what do you think of the Emerging Church Movement? And also, nice shoes!”
Well, my good friends, I feel the time has come for me to give a public answer on the question of the Emerging Church Movement, or ECM as the kids are calling it these days. After an exhaustive few days of studying their blog and reading their book, I feel both compelled and qualified to speak. I am not now, nor will I ever be a part of the ECM, for the following five reasons:
1) I can’t afford the clothing. Instead of normal clothes, like khakis and a polo, the ECM has adopted as its uniform a kind of gothic/grunge/indie look. In the rush to sell out to the idol of relevance, even their leaders are dressing like they just crashed their Vespas into an Urban Outfitters. Do we really need another part of the body of Christ so bent on cultural appropriateness that they make people buy a whole new set of clothing just to fit in? Until and unless the ECM starts wearing normal people clothes, I will never be emergent.
2) ECM people don’t believe that the Bible has any value. The following quote comes from Brian McLaren’s book, The Last Word of the Temptation of Christ, and it serves as a kind of manifesto for the movement. In it, he states:
“I … book … bad for … reading … to … bible.” (pg 45-86, selected)
Could their position be any clearer? They hate the Bible! Without the firm foundation of biblical truth, is it any wonder that these people are casting about for other spiritual guides to fill the void? Until and unless the ECM returns to the Bible as the foundation of the Christian faith, I will never be emergent.
3) The ECM prays sky-clad to the moon-goddess. The ECM has embraced something called “Celtic Spirituality”, which is basically the same thing as Wicca. The primary mode of worship in Wicca is stripping naked and praying to the Moon Goddess and her Horned Consort. Horned? Like the Devil? Yes! Instead of studying the scriptures, these young people are composing grimiores, watching Lord of the Dance, and reveling in the pagan mysticisms of the Wicca-Celtic black arts! Nowhere in scripture does it say that we should allow Celtic culture to influence Christian culture; in fact, the Bible doesn’t even mention the Celts! Until and unless the ECM leaders renounce public nudity, Wicca, and Celtic Druidism, I will never be emergent.
4) The ECM has embraced postmodernism. Instead of being at home in the mechanistic formalism of the International Style, the ECM has whole-heartedly embraced a return to wit, ornament, and irony. Whether it’s the eclectic referencing of Sterling’s Staatsgalerie Stuttgart, the elusive angularity of Thom Mayne’s University of Cincinnati Student Rec Center, or the sweeping monochrome expanses of Frank Gehry’s Guggenheim Bilbao, this kind of flagrant collapse of foundationalism has no place in our church. How can we offer any hope to people if we ourselves have forsaken the certain foundations of the past to embrace the uncertainty of the present? Until and unless the ECM steps back from the precipice of postmodernism, and returns to the firm footing of foundationalism, I will never be emergent.
5) ECM people eat their young. I don’t want to gossip, so I won’t name any names here, but I have a friend who is part of an emerging church in Seattle, who heard this story about this other emerging church where, instead of taking communion in the normal way, they eat their own young! Is this really the sort of thing we want to be encouraging in our church? I mean, it’s one thing for the Irish to do it, like say if they had a big famine or what not, but for the church to embrace it as a sacrament is outrageous! What ever happened to wine and bread? Until and unless the ECM publicly renounces child cannibalism, except in cases of extreme Irish famine, I will never be emergent.
I have attempted to contact the leaders of the ECM to discuss my concerns, but both emails were returned unopened. Since they refuse to dialog on these issues, my only recourse is to air these concerns publicly, in the blog-o-net. I hope that this post can be the start of a broad conversation. I’d like to hear from you, so feel free to post in the comment section below. Regardless of whether you agree with me, or if you disagree with the ECM, whether you are Fundamentalist or a Conservative Evangelical, all opinions are welcome.
Jono 10:15 pm on 25 February 2006 Permalink
Hey Michael, what kind of shoes do you have on? Would POMO-churches be considered as apart of the ECM? I hear the pastors at Freedomize don’t wear shoes. They be POMO. I think.
michael lee 5:27 pm on 26 February 2006 Permalink
Scot McKnight gets it:
Emergent Dress
Sue Ellen 3:39 am on 15 March 2006 Permalink
I always wondered how it took place. Why would someone go to the extreme though…
john 4:15 pm on 9 April 2006 Permalink
aww man, that is funny as hell…. (i’m guessing you aren’t really seriously against the ecm at heart, right?)
Mac 7:10 am on 16 July 2006 Permalink
Not only was the original post hilarious, the comments are just priceless. I neded a good laugh.
In the same vein I have an article at The Doghouse on Jesus and megachurches. Enjoy and I’ll be back often.
http://azotuscafe.com/Doghouse/New/index2.htm
Mac
michael lee 8:12 am on 16 July 2006 Permalink
Oh man, is this thing still kicking around?
Morphea 2:07 am on 26 August 2006 Permalink
Hell yeah it is. Kicking around up in the HIZZY, my brothah.
between now and not yet » Blog Archive » why i am not emergent… setting it straight 4:22 pm on 9 September 2006 Permalink
[...] There are so many good blogs out there. So much wit and insight. Luke put me on to this one by Michael Lee that you just have to read. It’s called Why I Am Not Emergent. This article cleared up so much for me. I have seen the light. Enjoy. [...]
The UnChurch » Blog Archive » WHY I AM NOT EMERGENT 11:26 am on 3 October 2006 Permalink
[...] O.K., so I swiped this off of a friends blog…rumor has it that he’s “logging off” permanently and I didn’t want to lose this jewel. I must confess, this little tidbit has won me over…I think I’m bailing on the Emerging Church along with him!//link// [...]
//re:generative divergence » Blog Archive » ‘Why I Am Not Emergent’ 5:52 pm on 16 October 2006 Permalink
[...] .::link [...]
bob 9:03 pm on 18 October 2006 Permalink
Hey Michael-
This is good stuff… I was wondering if I could have permission to publish this in next Month’s Next Wave?
Also, I’ve started a new Adventures in Emerging column that consists of photopieces like so
I’d love to feature some of the ones you’ve done like this one…
What do you think?
aly hawkins 9:38 pm on 18 October 2006 Permalink
I can’t speak for Michael, but…hell, yes!
Chad 9:43 pm on 18 October 2006 Permalink
I actually can speak for Michael. He’s an employee.
Hell yes.
Travis McClain 4:08 pm on 20 October 2006 Permalink
Well said. Possibly bordering on blasphemy…good place to be I think.
Sharolyn 1:02 pm on 2 January 2007 Permalink
What was the order? Did it go
1) Brian McLaren’s 30 page article, “why I am emergent” (which I am not finding online)
then
2) James McDonald’s “Why I am not emerging”
then
3) This?
Sharolyn 4:02 pm on 2 January 2007 Permalink
I just noticed I was the 100th responder! Is there a prize?
michael lee 8:42 pm on 2 January 2007 Permalink
[quote comment="35157"]What was the order? Did it go
1) Brian McLaren’s 30 page article, “why I am emergent” (which I am not finding online)
then
2) James McDonald’s “Why I am not emerging”
then
3) This?[/quote]
Pretty much, except that I didn’t really read the McLaren article. (For a guy with ECM sympathies, I’ve read almost none of McL’s stuff. And the stuff I have read I didn’t particularly care for.)McDonald’s salvo came during a time when it seemed like every single “authoritative” voice in the evangelical and fundamentalist circles were giving their opinions on why the ECM was a heretical monster from the 9th circle of hell.
The one thing that they all had in common was a total lack of understanding of what the movement consisted of, heavy reliance on conjecture and hearsay, and an incredibly condescending tone. It’s my hope that this parody managed to capture all of those things.
Sharolyn 9:19 am on 3 January 2007 Permalink
I read the parody before I knew anything of the EC, and thought it was hilarious. It stands on its own, yet makes more sense now that I have done some reading.
I’m shocked that you haven’t read McLaren! I thought he was Mr. Emerging Church. I’m still learning.
How were you introduced to the emerging church? I had never heard of it before Addison Rd.
Scot McKnight 12:30 pm on 12 April 2007 Permalink
I’m not sure which “stream” you are in, but if you’re not floating into Lake Emerging I’m not sure who is.
Chris seay 8:00 pm on 12 April 2007 Permalink
Dude…for the last time get this straight….. I was not completely nude at the full moon festival. I was wearing RC Sproul boxers the whole time!
great piece of work! my hat’s off to you for making me smile today.
Blessings,
Chris Seay
Morphea 10:55 pm on 12 April 2007 Permalink
Chris: yeah, but the fly was undone. Filthy heathen!
John Frye 7:30 am on 14 April 2007 Permalink
I agree with TSK. This analysis of and warning about the ECM is the best researched I’ve seen. It makes D.A. Carson look soooooo uninformed.
The Real Chad 10:30 am on 22 June 2007 Permalink
ECM does public nudity? Why didn’t anyone tell me?
You have no idea how many churches and religions that I have been kicked out of for practicing public nudity or even suggesting its practice. It’s unbelievable.
I thought when you were restored to an unbroken relationship with God, that you were supposed to drop the “fig leaf” and shed the animal skins for your natural created coverings. Coincidently, I have lost several church jobs for using a fig leaf.
Why is this so frowned upon? Is it because of the raw intensity of the sideways frown?
Well, from now on I am ECM through and through. Bring on the tasty babies!
aly hawkins 12:29 pm on 22 June 2007 Permalink
“The raw intensity of the sideways frown”
Tagline alert!
Simone 3:29 pm on 26 June 2007 Permalink
This was my first introduction to addison road. Great to read it again!
[ christians * at * large ] » links for 2007-10-01 5:22 am on 1 October 2007 Permalink
[...] Why I Am Not Emergent at Addison Road (tags: humor emergent) [...]
Why I’m Not Emergent… « 1:27 pm on 30 October 2007 Permalink
[...] I’m Not Emergent… This is a very funny post written by some guy I don’t know. But, I really like humor – especially [...]
Jon 10:40 am on 3 March 2009 Permalink
Did you by chance read what you wrote at all? Im not part of the emergent church but I have done my fair share of research on the topic, and im pretty sure you just called it a cult. Its not a cult, its not gothic or mystical, its simply a group of people contextulizing the gospel to fit a culture without changing the gospel. Please do research before you post something like i heard my friend say they eat people.
aly hawkins 11:40 am on 3 March 2009 Permalink
God, I miss the ’90s. Remember when irony and satire were like a second language everybody understood? Yeah. Good times.
Chad 1:15 pm on 3 March 2009 Permalink
Remember “Reality Bites?” I still know how to precisely define “Irony,” because of that movie.
Plus, that was when Winona Ryder was super hot and not a klepto.
michael lee 2:32 pm on 3 March 2009 Permalink
She was totally super hot. I loved that movie.